Skip to main content
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source

Informing you and your community in 2025

Bridge Michigan’s year-end fundraising campaign is happening now! As we barrel toward 2025, we are crafting our strategy to watchdog Michigan’s newly elected officials, launch regional newsletters to better serve West and North Michigan, explore Michigan’s great outdoors with our new Outdoor Life reporter, innovate our news delivery and engagement opportunities, and much more!

Will you help us prepare for the new year? Your tax-deductible support makes our work possible!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate

A death on the Internet and the gift of time

Last week, the New York Times reported that Océane, a young French woman, narrated and filmed her death by throwing herself under a train. The entire episode was posted on Periscope, a live-streaming app owned by Twitter. Excerpts were run later on YouTube.

Also according to the Times, last month two French teens assaulted a 24-year-old drunk in Paris and later posted – again on Periscope – images of them laughing and bragging about the assault. And in Ohio, a 17-year-old-girl filmed an alleged rape committed on a girlfriend and not only did not intervene but filmed the event and streamed a video of it, too, on Periscope.

Other than being shocked and outraged, what are we to make of these disturbing events?

Well, Thomas Husson, a Paris-based technologist at Forrester Research, says this (also quoted in the Times): “We now live in a dictatorship of real time.” By which he meant largely that a world in which everything is broadcast instantly, without perspective, is changing the very nature of what we know and how we know it.

We now live in a dictatorship of real time?

> CLICK HERE TO DONATE TODAY!

Forgive me. I’m 77. I was brought up in a different age, one when we paused before saying something menacing and where newspapers ran their printing presses once a day. This necessary delay often allowed time for reporters to reflect before writing their stories, enabled a considered response to events, allowed editors to mull the day’s happenings before setting them before the public.

But today’s technology allows us – and seemingly compels many of us – to post simultaneously and in real time. And as a result everything is different.

Everything.

Facebook, the current king of social media, is now the world’s largest source for news. Republicans know this; that’s why they are so upset with the organization over alleged biases against conservative viewpoints in its “Trending” news section.

Even worse, a substantial number of people say their get their news entirely from 140-character posts – characters – on Twitter. Again, forgive me. That makes me worry.

A friend in Western Michigan, one of the most able people I know, thinks that ever since cell phones became ubiquitous, the country has become ungovernable. It’s now possible to generate a flash mob by means of a Twitter post, quickly mobilizing a thundering herd with 140 characters. A consciously false posting generates instant reaction before it can be corrected. Anybody with a computer is now a publisher, while, sadly, nobody’s an editor.

Policy-makers, let alone politicians, are now allowed no space for reflection before being obliged by an increasingly stringent daily news cycle into saying something – maybe “popping off” is a more accurate expression. A question answered off the cuff in a press conference is moved around the world at lightning speed, setting off God only knows what kinds of unanticipated responses.

The result is an acceleration of events that imposes dimly perceived but very important changes in the way we think. The best parallel I can draw is to point to the ways climate change threatens animals which cannot adapt quickly enough to survive by the ordinary, slow processes of evolution.

And because events are more and more a case of stimulus followed almost immediately by response, our society’s mechanisms for coping with change are increasingly dated and ineffective.

Well before the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination was settled, people in the Bernie Sanders campaign were quoted on social media as interested in creating separate organizations designed to attack Donald Trump from both the left and the right, avoiding entirely any relationship with the Democratic Party.

In a nation that revels uneasily in its diversity, social organizations like political parties which cluster people together are the bedrock of our national unity, together with churches and voluntary groups like bowling leagues and PTA’s.

Lose these, and the alternative is an increasingly splintered society in which the mirror of our togetherness is jagged and cracked.

Sure, what’s happening today is freedom of speech and a monument to diversity of thought and action – coupled with the relentless advance of technology. But that, in turn, may result in an increasingly evident, powerful and worrisome dictatorship of real time.

How impactful was this article for you?

Only donate if we've informed you about important Michigan issues

See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:

  • “In order for this information to be accurate and unbiased it must be underwritten by its readers, not by special interests.” - Larry S.
  • “Not many other media sources report on the topics Bridge does.” - Susan B.
  • “Your journalism is outstanding and rare these days.” - Mark S.

If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we'll feature your quote next time!

Pay with VISA Pay with MasterCard Pay with American Express Pay with PayPal Donate Now